ACK/Cmnt: [SRU][J:linux-bluefield][PATCH v2 0/2] mlxbf-pmc: Replace SAUCE patch with upstream commit

[David Thompson]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Agathe Porte <agathe.porte at canonical.com>
> Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2025 9:04 AM
> To: Shravan Ramani <shravankr at nvidia.com>
> Cc: kernel-team at lists.ubuntu.com; David Thompson
> <davthompson at nvidia.com>
> Subject: ACK/Cmnt: [SRU][J:linux-bluefield][PATCH v2 0/2] mlxbf-pmc: Replace
> SAUCE patch with upstream commit
> 
> 2025-06-26 11:11 CEST, Shravan Kumar Ramani:
> > This submission addresses the following issue:
> >
> > Replace SAUCE patch with upstream commit (Patches 1 and 2)
> >
> > BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2113757
> >
> > SRU Justification:
> >
> > [Impact]
> > The mlxbf_pmc BlueField platform driver in the Jammy repo consists of
> > a SAUCE patch that needs to be replaced with the corresponding upstream
> commit.
> >
> > [Fix]
> > The fix is to revert the SAUCE patch, and replace it with upstream
> > commit for the same functionality.
> >
> > [Test Case]
> > * Boot BF2/BF3 platform, verify no new errors with loading the driver.
> > * Test sysfs interface exposed by driver for programming various
> > counters and events.
> >
> > [Regression Potential]
> > Minimal
> >
> >
> > Shravan Kumar Ramani (2):
> >   Revert "UBUNTU: SAUCE: platform/mellanox: mlxbf-pmc: Support
> >     additional PMC blocks"
> >   platform/mellanox: mlxbf-pmc: Support additional PMC blocks
> 
> Please target the SRU bug to jammy.
> 

Hi Agathe,

Is the "target the SRU bug to Jammy" comment a request for us to edit the SRU bug (Nvidia side) or a note to do this on Canonical side?

In the past, we've just created the SRU bug and then used either the "J" or "N" designation.  Let us know if there are other steps we need to be doing on Nvidia side.

> With that:
> 
> Acked-by: Agathe Porte <agathe.porte at canonical.com>