[Bug 20892] New: Adept removed clamav compiled from source an installed outdated Ubuntu package without ASKING

[bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.ubuntu.com]

Please do not reply to this email.  You can add comments at
http://bugzilla.ubuntu.com/show_bug.cgi?id=20892
Ubuntu | adept

           Summary: Adept removed clamav compiled from source an installed
                    outdated Ubuntu package without ASKING
           Product: Ubuntu
           Version: unspecified
          Platform: i386
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: adept
        AssignedTo: jriddell at ubuntu.com
        ReportedBy: milan.chris at skynet.be
         QAContact: kubuntu-bugs at lists.ubuntu.com


READ THE GODDAMN SUMMARY ,EVEN FILING A BUG SEEMS TO BE DESIGNED TO SCREW YOU AROUND
IN short ,for the 2nd time ,ADEPT removed the Clamavpackage which I compiled
from the updated sourcecode(Clamav0.87.1 is current version ,using Ubuntu s h i
t repositories leaves an " outdated installation " error in clamav's logs)
The strange part is ,I only wanted to install the Qcad partslibrary,but ADEPT
felt like it could do anything an simply downgraded my Clamav back to the
obsolete Ubuntupackage ,I mean ,doesn't this piece of c r a p know the diffrence
between 0.87-1 and 0.87.1( the latter being the most up to date cause it's been
compiled from SOURCE !) futhermore shouldn't it leave this decision up to me ? 
To be honest people , I about had it with this overhyped distro, if other
distros have these kinds of problem ,I can accept it .Want to know why,BECAUSE
THEY DON'T GET THE AMOUNT OF MONEY YOU PEOPLE HAD TO BACK THEM UP.
Either you people start learning ,or stop calling yourselfs developpers!
Or does one need to be the author of "The Cathedral and Bazaar" before you
accept critics? sh ITheads get cracking!

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.ubuntu.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.