Kubuntu instability...

Branko Vukelic bg.branko at gmail.com
Mon Oct 23 19:23:47 UTC 2006


Hi list,

This is not really a problem relating to anything in particular... It's more 
like my cumulative experience of using Kubuntu...

THIS IS RATHER LONG. IF YOU GET BORED DON'T SAY I DID NOT WARN YOU! AND THIS 
IS NOT A DISTRO COMPARISON, FLAME WAR STARTER, OR A TROLL. :-)

I have used Ubuntu as my very first (excluding Red Hat that lived for 20 
minutes on my main disk a few years ago) linux experience. Love on first 
sight, I might add. Since then, everything but work is done under Linux in my 
house. :)

After a while, I discovered the KDE, and all the wonders of an well organized 
and highly customizable desktop environment.

After a few months (actually, I think it was about half an year), I was up to 
my neck with various software I pulled off the repos, drivers, codecs. Ubuntu 
couldn't handle it any longer and broke down completely... I got frustrated 
trying to fix it and accidentally erased all my photos (wedding, kid's birth, 
everything)... So I finally gave Kubuntu a kick in the butt off my PC and 
switched to Slackware.

Meanwhile, search for the perfect distro continued leading me to Suse, 
Kanotix, ELive, Puppy, and Arch Linux. In Arch I found the stability and ease 
of use I was looking for...

I used Arch for about six months, but found it difficult to have to compile 
less common pieces of software from scratch. I did enjoy it in Slackware, but 
I have a small kid and a job, so I can't spend so much time compiling stuff. 
So, here I was using Kubuntu again.

But here in Kubuntu, system instability is a pain in the back. I have only 
installed a few things off unofficial repos (which are, however, mentioned in 
the wiki), but the system just isn't as snappy as an Arch fully loaded with 
codecs, apps and drivers. Moreover, I frequently experience unwanted and 
unexpected behavior from all apps that I use daily.

Don't get me wrong. I'm not an average computer user (or at least I like to 
think I'm not). I'm not a geek either, but I like to fiddle with insides of a 
system when time permits. But this time, time is not something I have.

I don't have enough spare time to tweak the s**t out of a distro until it 
works as it should. Arch, for example, was quick to install and set up. And 
the pacman package manager pulled off the repo the stuff I needed and 
installed everything without an error... Every thing worked out of the box 
and even Compiz worked as per wiki directions. I was amazed by how much less 
effort it required compared to a Slackware, for example, or other immature 
distros out there. That ease of use far surpasses what Kubuntu was meant to 
achieve. The only thing I lacked in Arch was 16,000+ programs in the 
repos. :)

So, I'm thinking of going back to Arch again if Kubuntu continues to behave 
badly as it does now. I just can't afford to spend so much time doing nothing 
but fixing the bits. But before I do, I'd like to give Kubuntu a benefit of a 
doubt. (Yeah, I am a bit sentimental when it comes to Kubuntu.)

What are your experiences with Kubuntu? I would especially appreciate comments 
from those users that used or are using multiple distros. Is it really 
somewhat unstable, or I'm just not doing things right?




More information about the kubuntu-users mailing list