New ATI Driver - they can't
Dexter Filmore
Dexter.Filmore at gmx.de
Mon Jul 23 09:36:31 UTC 2007
On Monday 23 July 2007 03:47:30 manchicken wrote:
> On Sunday 22 July 2007 12:03:07 Dexter Filmore wrote:
> > It would be an infringement to document a patent protected piece of
> > hardware by revealing what makes it tick in a open source driver.
> > Totally would.
>
> Doesn't mean they couldn't offer a patent license, patent protection, or
> promise to look the other way.
>
"Promise to look the other way"? :D
--
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GCS d--(+)@ s-:+ a- C++++ UL++ P+>++ L+++>++++ E-- W++ N o? K-
w--(---) !O M+ V- PS+ PE Y++ PGP t++(---)@ 5 X+(++) R+(++) tv--(+)@
b++(+++) DI+++ D- G++ e* h>++ r* y?
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
http://www.stop1984.com
http://www.againsttcpa.com
More information about the kubuntu-users
mailing list