ECC RAM failure data - jre
Steven Vollom
stevenvollom at sbcglobal.net
Thu Feb 26 15:47:16 UTC 2009
On Thursday 26 February 2009 06:21:12 john_re wrote:
> Do you use ECC RAM? Do you have any data about failure rates?
>
> I'm evaluating this for a system with 8GB DRAM, &
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynamic_random_access_memory#Errors_and_error_
>correction says
> "Tests[ecc]give widely varying error rates, but about 10-12upset/bit-hr
> is typical, roughly one bit error, per month, per gigabyte of memory.
>
> In most computers used for serious scientific or financial computing and
> as servers, ECC is the rule rather than the exception, as can be seen by
> examining manufacturers' specifications."
>
>
> So, for that data 8GB DRAM is about 8 errors per month, ie about
> one per 3-4 days.
>
> What rates do you have?
I have just built a system much like you describe, and it also is 8gb of ram.
A question came to mind, is the machine you are considering capable of
handling ECC ram. Most motherboards will not accept it.
I really don't have an answer to your question, however, recently, on my other
computer I discarded a stick of ram that was causing problems. By removing
the bad memory, I fixed the problem, however it did not make that many errors,
still I was advised to get rid of it. I was told that memory that has any
errors is bad memory.
As far as my new computer is concerned, only a few motherboards other than
server motherboards use ECC ram. Both the motherboard and the ram are
generally quite pricey. I spent a yeas plus bidding on motherboards just to
get one that I could afford, and it was $170. As for the ram, when I bought
mine, it cost $798 a stick for 2gb sticks. Right now, the memory I have is a
lot cheaper, but still more expensive than the new faster regular ram.
What I have is DDR2 SDRAM at 667mhz 240 pin and made by AXIOM. Current
technology is much faster, and non-error correcting is still less expensive
than that like mine. If your primary concern is for accuracy, then ECC is
probably what you need. Also, I couldn't find a motherboard that could handle
more than 8gb of ECC that wasn't a server board. My motherboard is an ASUS
M3N-HT Deluxe. It's main customer was gamers. I don't play games, but that
feature was a reason for getting this motherboard for most buyers, I was told.
It has the software and physical capability to speed up any chip on the board,
I think. I know it can increase the speed of the processor and memory like
mine. In fact I am going to increase my 667mhz to at least 800 after I get my
system stabilized. I have been told that is the minimum for my ram. And DDR3
is way faster than DDR2, I am told.
If you are aware of the things I am talking about, I have wasted your time,
however, if you haven't looked into that aspect, you would probably find it a
lot cheaper to purchase and use regular DDR3, and replace it as needed than
purchase ECC ram. I am not trying to discourage you, it is just I have been
struggling with getting my computer running, and because my computer is not a
server, it has been trouble solving those problems due to the ECC ram.
The experts who advised me about errors in RAM said not to tolerate any errors
at all. I am not an expert. I just have personal experience to share. And
when you made mention of 8gb. That is what my board can use and what I have.
If you want to talk more about it, contact me off line, because it really isn't
a topic for this particular forum.
Steven
More information about the kubuntu-users
mailing list