Akonadi?

[D. R. Evans]

Derek Broughton said the following at 03/09/2009 11:52 AM :

> 
> _You_ don't use Akonadi.  It's a back-end, that's all.  Whether it's a
> useful one, I'm still not sure.

Isn't it a bit weird that users are presented with configuration setup, then?

At the very least, it seems like there should be a way to know which
applications are using the back-end. There's not much point in configuring
it if you don't know which applications it's going to affect.

I'm not questioning your assertion.

> 
> Nepomuk is afaict worse.  

Yeah; that was the one I was really concerned about. It seems to be
completely hopeless to me.

I keep getting the nagging feeling, though, that it's some kind of powerful
tool that is sitting inside my computer waiting for me to access it, if
only I knew how.

(And akonadi and nepomuk sure use a lot of CPU for things that don't seem
to do anything useful.)

  Doc

-- 
Web:  http://www.sff.net/people/N7DR

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 260 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kubuntu-users/attachments/20090309/9cbbd1b5/attachment.sig>