Nonstandard License in PPA -- SoulFu
Daniel Elstner
daniel.kitta at googlemail.com
Mon Nov 12 16:42:49 GMT 2007
Hi,
Am Sonntag, den 11.11.2007, 13:08 +0000 schrieb Terence Simpson:
> It does "sound" like a free license and I suppose if it's freely
> distributable (as binary and source) and modifiable then it should be
> acceptable.
I can't help chiming in. Sounds "free"? This is probably the most
non-free license I ever had the fun to read...
In fact, I wonder if it's actually valid to demand that no charges may
be claimed for distribution by third parties -- not even for the media.
I don't think it's even possible to avoid that "money changes hands" at
least indirectly.
> I'd ask in #launchpad (on irc.freenode.net) and/or ask on launchpad
> answers[2], to see if one of the launchpad team (who are good with
> licenses) can give you a definite answer.
As a law layperson, I'd be interested to hear how this went.
--Daniel
More information about the launchpad-users
mailing list