Launchpad bug statuses
Forest Bond
forest at alittletooquiet.net
Tue Oct 2 22:07:42 BST 2007
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 05:52:56PM -0300, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 04:50:20PM -0400, Forest Bond wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 09:14:34PM +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> > > * "Fix Committed (Please Test My Fix)"
> > >
> > > The status is used by the some teams to mark bugs which have been fixed
> > > upstream since it makes easier to review bugs that have a patch to
> > > backport or should be closed when the next version is uploaded
> >
> > Isn't the correct way to handle this to add the upstream project to launchpad
> > and set the bug so that it also affects upstream? Then you can be explicit
> > about the bug's status upstream.
> >
> > This came up recently here:
> >
> > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/newt/+bug/54555
>
> Well, the issue is that Sebastian would like to be able to look at
> Ubuntu bugs and see which ones have been fixed upstream and which ones
> haven't. But I argue there is already a report that tells him that, in
> the advanced page of the bug search.
And hey, it even works well! :)
Launchpad sure does give you enough rope to ... choose an alternative workflow.
Is there nothing that can be done to make the correct workflow more obvious?
I think the designed workflow is a good way to go. The biggest problem is
discovering it.
Thanks,
Forest
--
Forest Bond
http://www.alittletooquiet.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/launchpad-users/attachments/20071002/516f33c1/attachment-0001.pgp
More information about the launchpad-users
mailing list