Massive bug expiration spree

[Curtis Hovey]

On Fri, 2007-09-21 at 22:41 -0500, Mario Limonciello wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> 
> I'm not too sure I agree with this massive expiration on the bug
> reports.  Just because there was no activity for 60 days doesn't make
> the bug invalid.  Lots of people have very large queues, and won't be
> getting to it for a while.  The bugs still do exist and this is making
> it appear as though they are insignificant or unnecessary.

It is very apparent that some additional constraints are needed in
addition to the discussion of the period of INCOMPLETE and UNASSIGNED.
We are preparing a restore of bugs that are duplicates, have milestones,
have recent comments, or one of the affected locations has an upstream
bugwatch.

-- 
__Curtis C. Hovey_________
http://launchpad.net/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/launchpad-users/attachments/20070922/a6535405/attachment.pgp