PPA TOS and license requirements

[Justin Dugger]

On 9/30/07, Reinhard Tartler <siretart at ubuntu.com> wrote:
> Caroline Ford <caroline.ford.work at googlemail.com> writes:
>
> > It is only free creative commons licensing that we should accept:
>
> Can you please elaborate why PPA should emphasize on 'free' software?
>
> Or in the other way, what's wrong with distributing software like
> the NX-Client, which is unmodifyable, but freely redistributable and
> useful software?
>

I imagine Canonical would very much like to charge you in such a
situation to host commercial software.

Justin Dugger