Bug Expiration Criteria

[Graham Binns]

On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 09:34:45AM +0100, Caroline Ford wrote:
> 2008/6/6 Graham Binns <graham.binns at canonical.com>:
> 
> >
> > However, Brian has a point. We automatically mark duplicate bugs as
> > invalid anyway, so they can't be considered for expiration because of
> > that, too.
> 
> Some teams do (eg desktop team) most teams don't.

I meant Launchpad does, but I was wrong (which'll teach me not to
respond to emails before I've had my coffee). Thanks for pointing that
out.

So the wording in the wiki document is correct, but it perhaps needs to
be better explained. I've updated the wiki page to explain what Martin
said upthread.

Cheers,

Graham

-- 
Graham Binns
http://launchpad.net/~gmb
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/launchpad-users/attachments/20080606/0bb03846/attachment.pgp