Rosetta: Need re-upload of packages to get upstream translations?

[Jeroen Vermeulen]

Martin Pitt wrote:

> In fact this spethial case has bothered me a lot. We have never
> supported running multiple evolution packages in parallel, since we
> don't do them (our package name does not have the version number, for
> example). Therefore I don't actually see a reason to not change the
> domain to just "evolution" in our packages?

And while we're at it, maybe gcc should be changed in the other 
direction?  AFAIK gcc-3.4, gcc-4.1 etc. all use the same domain even 
though they can easily run side by side.  Worth patching up the packages 
maybe?


Jeroen