USA LoCo Consistency

Eugene eugenedv57 at cox.net
Sun Feb 11 00:29:37 GMT 2007


Not many states have cities that cross borders. Even in the rare case that
that does happen, I don't see why an internet group is not feasible.

Gene V

-----Original Message-----
From: loco-contacts-bounces at lists.ubuntu.com
[mailto:loco-contacts-bounces at lists.ubuntu.com] On Behalf Of Jan Claeys
Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 2:11 PM
To: loco-contacts at lists.ubuntu.com
Subject: Re: USA LoCo Consistency

Op dinsdag 23-01-2007 om 17:59 uur [tijdzone +0000], schreef Jono Bacon:
> I would like to see every LoCo in the USA being organised at a state
> level, and each LoCo having smaller sub-regional groups. So, you may
> have ubuntu-texas and then have a houston group as part of that LoCo.
> The key point here is that each team looks after a state - this works
> well with the US and geographically makes sense. 

Considering that many metropolitan areas cross state or even country
borders, does this really make sense geographically?

-- 
Jan Claeys


-- 
loco-contacts mailing list
loco-contacts at lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/loco-contacts




More information about the loco-contacts mailing list