[loco-contacts] Our teams reject the new LoCo Council policy
Nathan Haines
nhaines at ubuntu.com
Tue Oct 14 18:15:01 UTC 2014
On 10/14/2014 10:54 AM, Marcos Lans wrote:
> So how you can force a loco becoming a sub-loco? I don't get it.
They're only "forced" in that previously these teams weren't formally
recognized at all.
This isn't a major change in policy. Only country-level (state-level in
the US) teams were allowed before, with previously-existing teams
allowed to continue to exist. Subteams were something that informally
existed. This policy is to guide very large teams that need to work in
local groups. A lot of major cities want to start their "own" LoCo team
and this is counter-productive and a waste of resources. Volunteers
should be working together in a bigger picture when the only difference
between them is the amount of vehicle traffic.
Now subteams can become independent, verified LoCos if extraordinary
circumstances allow it. A independent, unique culture almost certainly
qualifies--but the LoCo Council isn't going around and making a list of
cultures to include and exclude. That's the job of each organized
team--once they are large enough to work independently--to determine
they need and bring the issue to the LoCo Council.
Regards,
Nathan
--
Nathan Haines
Ubuntu - http://www.ubuntu.com/
More information about the loco-contacts
mailing list