[Maas-devel] Kanban board changes for QA
Francis J. Lacoste
francis.lacoste at canonical.com
Tue Oct 9 15:25:48 UTC 2012
On 12-10-09 12:07 AM, Julian Edwards wrote:
> I thought that we were only putting feature cards in the done-done lane
> though? I've replicated what we used to have where tasks/bugs go in the
> 'done' lane (and get archived from there) and when all the tasks/bugs are
> finished we move the green feature card to QA and then done-done.
>
Well, that makes sense for the Story lanes because a story isn't done
until all its related tasks card are done. But for defects, I think they
are standalone in themselves. And if a defects wasn't found during QA,
it probably still makes sense to drive through the QA lane.
I've removed the Done sublane from the Defects swimlane.
> Happy to be corrected if my understanding is wrong :)
--
Francis J. Lacoste
francis.lacoste at canonical.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 259 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/maas-devel/attachments/20121009/b1b297f0/attachment.pgp>
More information about the Maas-devel
mailing list