Subject: Let us know what you think

From: Daniel van Vugt <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 15:00:39 +0100

Hi all (and this is directed mostly at the wider world outside of 
mir-team), a quick poll:

Which of these names makes more sense to you?

MirTouchInput = read_all_fingers();
MirTouchEvent = read_all_fingers();
MirTouchInputEvent = read_all_fingers();

---

From: Kevin Gunn <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 08:06:05 -0600

+1 MirTouchInputEvent

On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 8:00 AM, Daniel van Vugt <
[email-masked]> wrote:

> --
> Mir-devel mailing list
> [email-masked]
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/
> mailman/listinfo/mir-devel
>

---

From: "Mario J. Rugiero" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 11:20:49 -0300

MirTouchEvent is clear enough, IMO. Is there any other kind of touch 
event aside from input events? If not, then I think the shorter name is 
the better name.

---

From: Daniel d'Andrada <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 16:27:39 +0100

> MirTouchInputEvent = read_all_fingers();
I found the example confusing, but if those are options for naming a 
structure containing a touch event, I would go for MirTouchEvent, naturally.

---

From: Gerry Boland <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 16:38:19 +0100

> MirTouchInputEvent = read_all_fingers();

My preference is MirTouchEvent - I can't think of how a touch related
activity could not be related to input.
-G