Subject: The R word

From: Daniel van Vugt <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 13:51:06 +0800

All,

Just a heads up... we're still seeing more regressions occurring than we 
really should.

Although we can't expect authors to predict how other authors might 
modify their code into the future [1], I think the common factors we can 
improve on are:

  * More manual testing of merge proposals - would have found many of 
the regressions we're seeing before they landed.

  * Smaller merge proposals - allows for higher quality, more carefully 
considered code reviews.

- Daniel

[1] Someone once said "It's impossible to make anything foolproof, 
because fools are so ingenious."