False info on Mir's project page

[Daniel van Vugt]

You know we could just let lp:mir/0.5 be the development branch and be 
more careful about noticing ABI breaks (at which point we must branch). 
Then everyone wins and lp:mir would be the development branch as well as 
one for packaging in Ubuntu-next.

So long as distro releases didn't happen without warning, which I think 
they can't as we'd have to approve changelog additions, then why not let 
distro package from our latest and greatest code?


On 11/07/14 14:43, Cemil Azizoglu wrote:
> I raised this with the CI team. Well, they at least didn't shoot the
> idea down right away and were willing to consider it. sil2100 said he'd
> think over the consequences and get back to us.
>
> Apparently, there is an (un)written rule that one should be able to get
> the latest distro code by pulling from lp:projname, which we would be
> violated. I raised the point that it's important to have a coherent
> launchpad project page.
>
> We'll see what happens.
>
> -Cemil