Should this be "core"?

[Alan Griffiths]

On 05/10/15 12:12, Alexandros Frantzis wrote:
> Otherwise, we could remove XCursor based theming, but we should ensure
> our built-in cursor images support all the predefined cursor types. In
> our client API we are exposing a set of predefined cursor names, which
> the BuiltinCursorImage implementation doesn't currently support.
> Although we don't explicitly promise that these are always supported, it
> would be surprising if our default implementation didn't provide them.

FWIW *my* initial surprise came from finding that tests using the
predefined cursor names don't work on phone images. (Because X cursors
are not present and libmirserver falls back to BuiltinCursorImage.)

So the problem exists already.