Fun with Unity8
Michał Sawicz
michal.sawicz at canonical.com
Fri Sep 18 07:13:22 UTC 2015
W dniu 18.09.2015 o 09:05, Daniel van Vugt pisze:
> Sounds like an improvement, thanks. In the long term though, I think you
> will find power users (and even some apps) want to launch non-Qt apps by
> simply executing them. Eventually (as with any other desktop OS) they
> will need to /just work/. So any wrapper will need to go away.
It's not about Qt or not. The shell requires to uniquely and reliably
identify a client. I can't see a way for this to happen securely without
a trusted third-party (today that's ubuntu-app-launch, it might be
apparmor).
Apps aren't able to directly launch other apps, they have to request an
app to be launched (generally via opening a URL), it's the user that
will ultimately decide whether they allow that or not.
Those are all security features that we might allow "power users" to
lift via a setting or similar, but will be the default behaviour for the
foreseeable future.
--
Michał Sawicz <michal.sawicz at canonical.com>
Canonical Ltd.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/mir-devel/attachments/20150918/d1cfc1eb/attachment.pgp>
More information about the Mir-devel
mailing list