Migration

Danilo Šegan danilo at canonical.com
Fri Aug 18 19:01:32 BST 2006


Hi Erdal,

Today at 19:33, Erdal Ronahi wrote:

>> Note that there was no migration from Hoary to Breezy, or from Breezy
>> to Dapper: they were open as pristine trees, thus losing previous
>> contributions (afaik, at least).
>
> There was no migration? Maybe we understand different things when
> talking about "migration".  Indeed, there were some translations lost
> between Breezy and Dapper. But most were imported from Rosetta. I know
> that quite well, because our team is doing almost all localization of
> Free Software using Rosetta. We have far more translations in Rosetta
> than upstream so far. We certainly would have been aware if everything
> had been lost.

As I said, it was only "afaik".  So, I guess I was partially wrong.
Anyway, there should be no need for any manual migration with future
releases.

But still, some may not have migrated any files on their own, and the
new procedure makes sure that those are migrated as well (even if this
late in the game).  I.e. this is what makes it a lot more complicated:
we needed to find what was not resubmitted or migrated by that other
script, and migrate it now.

> I am glad you found a "once and for all" solution to the problems.
> That will make Rosetta even more important.

Just to note that it was again Carlos who did most of the work: I was
mainly there to help take the load off him for other Rosetta tasks,
and to bring him cookies while he was working. :)


Cheers,
Danilo



More information about the rosetta-users mailing list