Ports,ports,ports..

[Leo Arias]

Nice!

On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 11:03 AM, Victor Palau <victor.palau at canonical.com>
wrote:

> Overall, seems like it would be good practice that if a snap publishes a
> service to a port, that:
>
>    - the port can be easily changed
>    - the snap can be updated told that it will be proxy-ed, and work well
>
> I would add this one: To easily print which port is being used
https://bugs.launchpad.net/snappy/+bug/1608572.
Ideally for me, when the service is installed it should print the URL to
access it.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/snapcraft/attachments/20161010/bc41cf78/attachment.html>