Ports,ports,ports..

[Robert Park]

On Oct 10, 2016 10:05 AM, "Victor Palau" <victor.palau at canonical.com> wrote:
>
> Overall, seems like it would be good practice that if a snap publishes a
service to a port, that:
> the port can be easily changed

Any suggestions on how best to do that? Snaps don't offer any sort of
configuration interface like charms do.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/snapcraft/attachments/20161010/4355a666/attachment.html>