Missing environment variables

[Sergio Schvezov]

El 22/10/16 a las 11:11, Gustavo Niemeyer escribió:
>
> If there's a recommendation, I'd suggest recommending the last known 
> stable, as the pace has been so fast that there are significant 
> benefits of running a more recent version.
>
> We also have a mechanism snaps can use to declare the dependency on 
> certain aspects of snapd, but unfortunately the common dir had a 
> couple of issues until it finally worked smoothly.
>
> We should really support a more explicit:
>
>     assumes: [snapd2.15]
>
> and leave the individual feature flags for aspects that can indeed 
> vary across environments.
>

In my other email I sort of came to the conclusion of using assumes :-)
I did not know about snapd2.15. where can we see the full list of keywords?