Building for different architectures
Sergio Schvezov
sergio.schvezov at canonical.com
Tue Feb 7 16:34:24 UTC 2017
On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 1:20 PM, Oliver Grawert <ogra at ubuntu.com> wrote:
> hi,
> On Di, 2017-02-07 at 16:07 +0000, Alan Pope wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Suppose I have a snap which requires a couple of non-archive debs as
> > stage packages. Typically I'd have a part for each which uses the
> > source: of a url directly to the deb using the dump plugin. This
> > works
> > fine building on my amd64 laptop (or wherever) and I end up with an
> > amd64 snap.
> >
> > However, if I get a request for an i386 (or indeed armhf) snap, it
> > will break because my i386 snapcraft run will pull an amd64 deb. If I
> > was pulling archive packages then of course the build can run in
> > launchpad and it will do the Right Thing. However, if my yaml
> > contains
> > hard coded arch-specific (non-archive) debs, that breaks, pulling in
> > amd64 deb on an i386 builder.
> >
> > I could have separate yamls per arch of course, but that seems
> > needlessly messy. What have others done in this case?
> >
> do you mean https://bugs.launchpad.net/snapcraft/+bug/1655797 ?
> looks like is was just fixed last week though...
> not sure how/if that works for "non-archive debs" though
>
This is somewhat different, the bugfix there was about bringing in other
arches for current arch ;-)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/snapcraft/attachments/20170207/4c1f23b7/attachment.html>
More information about the Snapcraft
mailing list