LDC compiler snap issues on 14.04 (ABI compatibility?)
Sergio Schvezov
sergio.schvezov at canonical.com
Thu Feb 16 04:10:36 UTC 2017
El miércoles, 15 de febrero de 2017 20h'09:36 ART, Joseph Rushton Wakeling
<joseph.wakeling at webdrake.net> escribió:
> On 11/02/17 17:31, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
>> I just reproduced the issue in a VirtualBox install of 14.04 to get these
>> details. Kernel report in kern.log:
>>
>> Feb 11 17:16:19 vb1404 kernel: [ 534.781526] traps: gcc[6209] general
>> protection ip:7f6632d1b1ee sp:7fff0a09e2f0 error:0 in
>> libc-2.23.so[7f6632bd8000+1bf000]
>>
>> And `dmesg | grep -i gcc` gave this output:
>>
>> [ 0.000000] Linux version 4.4.0-62-generic
>> (buildd at lcy01-33) (gcc version
>> 4.8.4 (Ubuntu 4.8.4-2ubuntu1~14.04.3) ) #83~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Jan 18
>> 18:10:30 UTC 2017 (Ubuntu 4.4.0-62.83~14.04.1-generic 4.4.40)
>> [ 534.781526] traps: gcc[6209] general protection ip:7f6632d1b1ee
>> sp:7fff0a09e2f0 error:0 in libc-2.23.so[7f6632bd8000+1bf000]
>>
>>> This may give enough information for someone to suggest the next step.
>>
>> I'm not very experienced at interpreting these kinds of
>> messages, but if I
>> understand right they would suggest a libc compatibility issue ... ?
>
> Folks, could I ping on the above?
>
> It seems like a rather severe limitation on the universality of
> the package (at
> a minimum it probably restricts the package to working on
> systems with the same
> or later libc) so I'm curious if anyone has any thoughts on if
> and how this
> could be ameliorated.
I'll check your snap first thing once I am at a computer again. From
experience with classic confinement though, stage-packages to provide
runnables are most of the time the root cause. There was discusssion on
having ld set --library-path in be core snap to have called binaries not
reach out to the system and get confused.
Zygmunt, any update on that?
--
Enviado con Dekko desde mi dispositivo Ubuntu
More information about the Snapcraft
mailing list