Please test my asciinema snap

[Gustavo Niemeyer]

I'm wondering if maybe we should simply drop all snapcraft wrappers for
classic snaps, specifically.

As it is, the amount of magic that is actually intended for strict snaps
seems to be hurting the behavior and understanding of classic snaps. I
doubt adding even more magic will help.



On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 2:35 AM, Stuart Bishop <stuart.bishop at canonical.com>
wrote:

>
>
> On 20 January 2017 at 19:59, Mark Shuttleworth <mark at ubuntu.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> Any recommendations for dealing with those?
>>
>
> Do exec* and friends need to be patched somehow, so that if processes are
> spawned from a classic snap with targets outside snapd containment then the
> environment is cleaned?
>
> I think this will affect all classic snaps that need to run subprocesses,
> such as screen, vim, tmux... with other wrapper variables like the LD_*
> settings leaking :-(
>
>
> --
> Stuart Bishop <stuart.bishop at canonical.com>
>
> --
> Snapcraft mailing list
> Snapcraft at lists.snapcraft.io
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/
> mailman/listinfo/snapcraft
>
>


-- 

gustavo @ http://niemeyer.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/snapcraft/attachments/20170123/1f2f6816/attachment.html>