Class confinement for Python snaps

[Jamie Strandboge]

On Fri, 2017-03-10 at 16:02 +0000, Sergio Schvezov wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Mar 2017 10:14:04 -0500, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> > 
> > I'm converting ubuntu-image from a devmode snap to a classic snap, but I'm
> > running into some problems.  ubuntu-image is a Python 3 application, and I'm
> > using snapcraft 2.27.1+17.4 on Zesty.
> Any reaosn you are moving from devmode to classic? The progression should be
> classic->devmode->strict
> 
> It is however unfortunate that classic confined snaps can make it to the
> stable channel while devmode ones cannot, maybe we need an alias for devmode
> (which would be as secure as classic confinment but with the common root as
> root) as in some cases it is an improvement over classic (not needing to deal
> with libraries and installable on Ubuntu Core).

While classic can make it to stable, do note that use of classic requires human
review where devmode does not.

-- 
Jamie Strandboge             | http://www.canonical.com

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/snapcraft/attachments/20170310/3fe5e0af/attachment.sig>