GPL compliance

Dean Linkous Linkousjunk at wvva.net
Sun Jul 2 21:49:50 BST 2006


good point!
if it did say that then I would say it means you could take a v2 covered
program, modify it, and stick it under v3. I would like to see a v3
everything myself.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Mario Vukelic" <mario.vukelic at dantian.org>
To: <sounder at lists.ubuntu.com>
Sent: Sunday, July 02, 2006 4:39 PM
Subject: Re: GPL compliance


> On Sun, 2006-07-02 at 16:28 -0400, Dean Linkous wrote:
> > Technically that isn't part of the GPL so no actually the GPL license
> > does
>
> oops
>
> > not say that. I wish it did though....
>
> Why? The first part is said in the GPL (that you can redistribute, etc.)
> and the second part (either version 2 ...) makes no sense as part of the
> license
>
>
> --
> sounder mailing list
> sounder at lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/sounder




More information about the sounder mailing list