Experience with postfix SASL not good

[Shawn McMahon]

On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 03:11:31PM +0100, Daniel Holbach said:
> 
> please just reopen the bug. All the people involved in filing and fixing
> this bug report will be notified and have the chance to look this up.
> The bug tracker is a much better place of having this kind of
> information.

I want to confirm first whether LaMont reported it fixed in Breezy, or
Dapper; I'm using Breezy on that box, and don't want to report a bogus
bug.  Can't tell how to figure that out from Malone, though.  Anybody
know how to get that information, short of emailing LaMont?


-- 
   Shawn McMahon    | Ubuntu: an ancient African word meaning "I am sick
   EIV Consulting   | of compiling Gentoo".
 http://www.eiv.com |                       - Jeff Waugh (paraphrased)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/sounder/attachments/20060321/21d5f857/attachment.pgp