Linux desktop lacks innovation

[Carsten Agger]

Liam Proven wrote:

>> >> The only "source code" ever brought forward as documentation were
>> >> unprotectable header files. So, someone who can write a statement
as in
>> >> the above must be either ignorant or deliberately misleading.
> >
> > Do you actually understand the paragraph that I wrote? May I suggest
> > that you re-read it to yourself a few times, slowly.
> >

What I *do* understand is that your phrasing suggests that since the
resolution was not that Linux did not contain infringing code, then
actually it did ... and nobody has ever published any fact to suggest
that such infringing code ever existed in the Linux kernel, which is not
what your paragraph hints; i.e., your paragraph crafted to be
deliberately misleading.