sounder Digest, Vol 81, Issue 56

[Avi]

Samuel Thurston wrote:
> But I have always considered "LTS" to be kind of a joke anyway.  I
> mean, if you have no support contract, what obligation does
> Ubuntu/Canonical have to support you, long term or otherwise?
> Contractually, the answer is zero, regardless of which release cycle
> you use.
> 

It's not that sort of support; It's providing patches & fixing bugs,
not helping configure software.

There's quite possibly some sort of a contract implied in there through
their having previously advertised three years of patching that'd stop
them just aborting mid-way through, but I imagine that'd be largely
dependent upon where you are, and IANAL anywhere.

-- 
Avi