Readjusting SRU review process

[Martin Pitt]

Steve Langasek [2013-06-04 15:26 -0700]:
> > My feeling is that having fewer SRUs (for the non-LTSes) altogether
> > would go a long way in raising motivation again; what's your feeling
> > about this?
> 
> I think it will help some with motivation.  However, I'm not sure how to go
> about achieving this result; for my part, pushing back on SRUs I think are
> unnecessary doesn't seem to have had much impact on the overall flow of the
> queue.  Do you have any suggestions?

Not a magic one of course. We could perhaps start with announcing this
to ~ubuntu-sponsors, so that we at least share a common understanding
with people who upload quite a lot of these SRUs? Otherwise, over time
hopefully developers will get re-trained about what kind of SRUs we
accept for non-LTSes after they got some rejections.

Thanks,

Martin
-- 
Martin Pitt                        | http://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com)  | Debian Developer  (www.debian.org)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/technical-board/attachments/20130607/d2dbba93/attachment.pgp>