wiki cleanup

[Mauricio Hernandez]

<SNIP>

> I don't have strong feelings either way, but ultimately on this one,
> I think my vote goes to Henrik.  I believe that the number of people
> actually creating pages in the Accessibility tree will remain relatively
> small, and wiki-savvy.  The number of people editing might be larger,
> but then folks who are re-organizing can clean up after bad edits that
> link incorrectly, yes?

Yes Kevin, if we are only considering linkingin the universe of
Accessibility wiki pages, sure, supages is the best choice.

But let's focus on the example where AbiWrod or Abiword (doesn't
matter for the example) is an applications that can effectibly work
very good for the a11y team editors. If you use Abiword on some pages
and want to make it to work as a link, then you should/will have to
check and make sure that is a non-existing page in all the /data dir.

If you don't check /data dir pages first and proceed to create the
Abiword page (cited on you page), all the other  'WantedPages' citing
Abiword will still be wanting an Abiword page because thay will not
know you just created the Abiword page the need.

(ooops, it is more difficult to express than i thought)

--
Cordialmente,

Mauricio Hernandez Z.

"Hell is repeating someone else's mistakes"
 (JPS)

[Mail escrito sin caracteres especiales o acentos para evitar
conflictos de lectura entre sistemas]

[En smilar contexto, evitemos enviar archivos .doc, .ppt o .xls.
Intentemos enviar solo formatos libres y mas livianos, como lo son
.txt, .html, .pdf, .odt, etc.]