Reporting AT bugs

[Daniel Holbach]

Hi everybody,

thanks Henrik, for pointing this out.

Am Mittwoch, den 14.12.2005, 10:25 +0000 schrieb Henrik Nilsen Omma:
> What is the best way of reporting these? Should these go straight into 
> the Ubuntu bug tracker, or should they go upstream to Gnome/OOo/Ff, or 
> all of the above? I think reporting AT-related bugs is a good way 
> forward generally on this. I guess we should also try to track these in 
> a sensible way in the wiki.

I think it's a sensible approach, to report them upstream and keep track
of them in the wiki. We could even add the mailing list as a CC on the
bugs, so everybody has the chance to fix the wiki status entry with a
few clicks. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Accessibility/Status might be a good
place for this.

If you identify something, which could be an easy fix or a you think we
should have a different default setting, that's something, where I or
Sebastien can help, in the other cases we most likely forward the bug
upstream.

Have a nice day,
 Daniel
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-accessibility/attachments/20051214/966e7fa4/attachment.sig>