Post-meeting Mail

[Tom Sparks]

--- On Sat, 18/12/10, Michael Chesterton <chesty at chesterton.id.au> wrote:
> Ryan Macnish wrote:
> > Ok, so i will leave the issue of the IRC structure
> alone, its clear
> > that some of the loco veterans dont want change, even
> for the benefit
> > of the loco. But also if i bring it up again i may get
> kicked from the
> > loco.
> > 
> > 
> > So now we have that sorted, i am agreeing not to bring
> up any more
> > issues about the loco that need discussing, because
> its evident that
> > some people in the loco are disturbed by this. So you
> will hear no
> > more complaints nor see any more action from me on
> this front.
> 
> I think the above email is a big part in why the team lost
> status, and
> it has set back the reinstate a long time. And it's not
> nisshh's fault,
> not one bit.
> 
> > As for the social stuff, if everyone just announces
> meetings and
> > events on the social platform of their choice (be that
> facebook,
> > identica, diaspora or whatever) then people will
> re-tweet it and know
> > about it, so we may get more activity and
> participation. Even things
> > like Urban Terror and stuff should be announced.
> 
> This is a great idea, it will attract more people, more
> energy, create
> more events, except the new people will hit the same wall
> nisshh hit and
> nothing will change.
> 
> I would care except there are so many other really fun and
> vibrant open
> source related groups in Sydney (where I live) that aren't
> affiliated
> with a company. I believe other states are in a similar
> position, or
> could be soon.

the more I read about the ubuntu-au community going downhill (losing of our offical loco status) , the more I feel some people may not be following the Ubuntu Code of Conduct

witch is sad to say :(

tom