banshee backport (some questions)

>
>
>
> Yes, that would be necessary in that case... but I don't care enough to
> write such spec... maybe jdong wants to ;)


Hmm, exactly what do one of these spec things look like? ;-)

I might write one, because there are always those little things (like a
simple package name change) that stops an otherwise perfectly good backport
candidate in its tracks.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-backports/attachments/20051113/381e289d/attachment.htm