[Bug 52696] Re: [backport] beagle 0.2.7

[Rafał Próchniak]

Oops. I haven't read instructions on backports wiki, only sticky thread
on the forums, which states (rule 2) that backports are ok if they are
compatible with existing libraries. My understanding was that if it
compiled cleanly, dapper-backport build would have had the dependencies
changed to reflect dapper state.

Of course, backports wiki clearly says I was wrong. I'm sorry.

BTW - if I understand package lists correctly (which is not that obvious
considering this unjustified request), no mono-dependent package will be
eligible for backporting at all from edgy to dapper as mono libraries
naming scheme changed (from mono-classlib into separate library
packages)?

Once again I'm sorry I waisted your time.

-- 
[backport] beagle 0.2.7
https://launchpad.net/bugs/52696