[Ubuntu-be] bank account -> minimal formal structure proposal

[François Schoubben]

> We want two coordinators:
> * with a demonstrated need to access ubuntu-be.org funds frequently
> (fairs,...)
> * 1 NL_BE, 1 FR_BE
> * who publish every ubuntu-be.org bank account transaction they make
> to this list and the web site

I agree

> 1. Candidates for coordinatorship propose themselves to the list.
> (optional) If there is more than one candidate per language,
> candidates discuss between them and step back voluntarily until there
> is only one candidate left.
> If impossible, further discussion.
> 2. As soon as this one candidate per language gets the public support
> of 10 list members, he is elected.

Ok

> proposal 2: mandate duration
> A coordinator is appointed for two years, with the possibility to
> resign early at any given moment. After this term, a new consensus
> election.

good. We'll just have to remember this in 2 years from now... Should we
have an online agenda ? :-)

> proposal 3: dispute resolution
> When a list member is unhappy about something the coordinator did:
> 1. private discussion with the coordinator.
> if unresolved:
> 2. public discussion
> if unresolved:
> 3. public ousting: 1.5 * the number of votes that elected the
> candidate needed; if ousting successful, new election

Shouldn't we put a maximum number ? What if somebody have (let's dream)
50 votes... If there is a problem with him, we'll have to find 75 people
"against" him ?
I think if 30 or 40 are "against", a new "election" must be decided...
Or a vote could occurs, the "pro" vs. the "cons" ?


That said, Mark and Cedric have my votes for now :-)

-- 
F.