Hugday needed

[Alberto Salvia Novella]

I agree with the proposal.


El 13/03/13 14:10, melchiaros escribió:
> Am 11.03.2013 20:44, schrieb Walter Garcia-Fontes:
>> * Fabio Marconi, marconifabio at hotmail.it [11/03/13 20:32]:
>>> Hallo!!
>>>
>>> I think that we have done a good work on Totem, Garcia simply great !!!
>>> Can we have some others candies for this week??
>> Thanks Fabio
>>
>> +1
>>
> There is one candidate I would like to suggest.
>
> It is more about infrastructure than userspace, but those of you who 
> help out sometimes in the "Answers" section know that there is 
> sometimes heavy trouble caused from.
>
> It is the package
>
> ubuntu-release-upgrader
>
> In my experience it is nothing worser than a system that fails 
> on/after upgrade.
>
> Regarding to
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader
>
> we have only 99 bugs open and with this much less then on totem(>300 
> when I remember correct), but they are harder to handle.
>
> Mostly users give only a weak description, of the kind of "it do not 
> upgrade".
>
> So here would be log reading a task that comes to us, to identifiy 
> what is the same(and I expect that there are some dublicates hidden) 
> and what is not.
>
> What do you think about?
>
> Handling bugs of the ubuntu-release-upgrader
>
> would be of some structural benefit that see wider than only on one 
> release or only the actual daily problems.
>
> A more stable release upgrader would decrease the fear of the people 
> to upgrade to the latest Ubuntu version.
>
> One consequence would be that we have less bugs on older version, 
> which swamp launchpad.
>


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2260 bytes
Desc: Firma criptográfica S/MIME
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-bugsquad/attachments/20130313/9c256ebf/attachment.bin>