[Bug 1458230] Re: libburn imposing 0.2x BD-R burn (5-6 hours)

[Njorl]

Thomas,

I slightly favour the second option as, although I think it is not yet
strictly proven, whereas the first is one of those assertions that
stands until disproven, it does have a reasonable chance of pointing
anyone who suffers a similar issue in the right direction fairly
quickly.

I may actually be ready to retest, in the next couple of months, but the
Linux distribution has gone out of support and I'll probably replace it
beforehand.  So, testing will be so far from scientific conditions as to
carry no significance unless it, against all expectation, reproduces the
problem.  (My Blu-ray writer has not exactly earnt its keep in its first
year.)

Any possibility for making libburn more idiot-proof?  If the log had
been able to decompose how the burn speed was determined, I might have
managed to check up on the bottleneck - and have avoided this drain on
your time.

Assuming this thread does not become locked, I will report my eventual
success with libburn.


Happy New Year!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Burning Team, which is subscribed to libburn in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1458230

Title:
  libburn imposing 0.2x BD-R burn (5-6 hours)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libburn/+bug/1458230/+subscriptions