OpenOffice.org 2.1

[Tee Jay Rosene]

Yes, that makes sense. Introducing new bugs would be counter-productive. I
think I'm going to stick with what I've got currently--it's not causing me
any grief, so it would be silly to change a good thing.
Thanks for the feedback,
Tee Jay

The problem is this: New versions of software bring in new bugs and
testing that you don't introduce regressions is a major task.

> I guess what I really want to know now is if it's worth it? Are there that
> many changes in OO.o 2.1 to bother with the trouble of removing the old
and
> installing the new? Or would I be better off to just wait until Feisty
comes
> out and have the newest version there?

It will likely be backported, so I would wait for that. I didn't see
anything that is absolutely needed. You can read the full release
notes at
http://development.openoffice.org/releases/2.1.0.html

Corey
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-ca/attachments/20061216/dea90830/attachment.html>