The new copyright law.

[Ralph Janke]

Well,

just be careful with the statements that they are correct. AFAIK, and 
IAAL but I don't
practice as one, Bill C-32 is only relevant for civil litigation, but 
has no criminal
sanctions at all.

So, a maybe better (maybe even more controversial) way of putting it, 
would be to
say that if the MPAA/MPEGLA/WHOEVER OWNS IT(not artists) want to be your
slaves, you cannot do a lot about it (amybe short of boycotting them in 
totally,
which might be that best way to get rid of them).

Just a thought,
Ralph

On 06/24/2010 03:51 AM, James wrote:
> in summary it was a total flop, basically you tried anything the 
> MPAA/MPEGLA/WHOEVER OWNS IT(not artists) that they didn't want, you 
> are a criminal, so they have to rethink it....AGAIN
>
> On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 11:29 PM, Mark Ueki Mina 
> <themarker0 at hotmail.com <mailto:themarker0 at hotmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     I saw a thread here a while ago, i can't find it in my emails i
>     must've deleted it. What was the conclusion to the copyright law
>     in canada coming in and it making it illegal to decrypt dvds? I
>     have to go talk to my MP about something, i was gonna ask him also
>     if it is true discrimination since it does discriminate against
>     linux users.
>
>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     Look 'em in the eye: FREE Messenger video chat Chat Now!
>     <http://go.microsoft.com/?linkid=9734382>
>
>     --
>     ubuntu-ca mailing list
>     ubuntu-ca at lists.ubuntu.com <mailto:ubuntu-ca at lists.ubuntu.com>
>     https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-ca
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-ca/attachments/20100624/6d6c26ad/attachment.html>