Why isn't gconf-editor in the menus by default?
Corey Burger
corey.burger at gmail.com
Mon Feb 11 19:07:44 GMT 2008
On 2/11/08, Scott James Remnant <scott at canonical.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2008-02-11 at 07:23 -0800, Corey Burger wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 4:19 AM, Jo-Erlend Schinstad
> > <joerlend.schinstad at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > gconf-editor is a really powerful application when you want to
> > tailor
> > your system. Even though it has about a million configuration
> > options,
> > I think it's very user friendly, offering sensible key names,
> > descriptions of their functions and easy navigation (apps >
> > appname >
> > preferences).
> >
> > The question is, then; why isn't it available in System >
> > Preferences
> > by default?
> >
> > It was removed as part of MenusRevisited because it is just that, a
> > power user tool. those that know about it can just run it and those
> > that don't won't mess up their systems with it.
> >
> This should not be a standard justification for why things are removed.
> Power Users are Users too, they still need to be able to get to things.
>
> Instead this is a good example of why the menu system is not a very good
> way of launching applications and utilities.
>
> Scott
> --
> Scott James Remnant
> scott at canonical.com
I agree that what I said is not a good generic response. I was merely
stating the explantion given for this specific case. And yes, menus suck.
Corey
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-desktop/attachments/20080211/ef0fd08c/attachment.htm
More information about the ubuntu-desktop
mailing list