dpatch on Makefile.in?
Magnus Therning
magnus at therning.org
Tue Jun 21 08:09:33 CDT 2005
Should a distribution specific patch modify Makefile.in or Makefile.am?
My personal preference would be modify Makefile.am instead and have a
specific patch (e.g. 99_autoreconf) that is applied as the very last
one. Any changes would require updating 99_autoreconf, but that's easy:
$ dpatch-edit-patch 99_autoreconf <the last real patch>
$ autoreconf
Anyone with any comments on this?
/M
--
Magnus Therning (OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4)
magnus at therning.org
http://therning.org/magnus
Software is not manufactured, it is something you write and publish.
Keep Europe free from software patents, we do not want censorship
by patent law on written works.
Security, like correctness, is not an add-on feature.
-- Andrew S. Tanenbaum
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/attachments/20050621/b60ca689/attachment-0001.pgp
More information about the ubuntu-devel
mailing list