Crash while upgrading kernel & stable releases

[Markus Kolb]

Matt Zimmerman wrote on Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 15:47:16 -0700:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 12:36:15AM +0200, Markus Kolb wrote:
> 
> > Matt Zimmerman wrote on Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 14:42:53 -0700:
> > > On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 11:34:56PM +0200, Markus Kolb wrote:
> > > 
> > [...]
> > > I don't know what gave you that impression, but I do know why you want this.
> > > I am explaining the way it actually works today, and why.
> > 
> > You have only written that selfcompiled kernel modules must be
> > recompiled. Is that a reason against availability?
> 
> This is not a question of availability; you have proposed that we should
> change the way that we name our kernels, and I have explained why we name
> them the way that we do.

It is a question of availability and my conclusion is the name change.
Without a reason the name change wouldn't make any sense!
If you know another way do that...