xxms into universe?

Sam Morris sam at robots.org.uk
Tue May 15 10:46:53 BST 2007


On Tue, 15 May 2007 09:53:37 +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:

> Martin Pitt <martin.pitt at ubuntu.com> writes:
>>
>> Sounds good to me, although totally dropping xmms should still be
>> considered if it is really that unmaintained and vulnerable. We have
>> one or two other music players in the archive after all...
> 
> I just want to note that I have the feeling that despite its dependency
> on gtk1, xmms is still a very popular music player. One reason for its
> popularity is that it has the exact look and feel like the winamp 2.x
> player, a very very popular music player from the windows world. Heck,
> it even can use the same themes like winamp 2.x.
> 
> Having said this, I think it would be sad to loose xmms completely.
> Let's try to keep it in universe.

Has anyone considered replacing it with 'audacious'? It sets out to be a 
simple fork of Xmms and a port to GTK+ 2.0. It doesn't go down the road 
of implenting a media library like XMMS2 and Beep Media Player (BMPx) 
have done.

At least, that was how it looked when last I used it. :)

-- 
Sam Morris
http://robots.org.uk/

PGP key id 1024D/5EA01078
3412 EA18 1277 354B 991B  C869 B219 7FDB 5EA0 1078




More information about the ubuntu-devel mailing list