pm-i still needed in hardy?

[Matthew Garrett]

On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 01:33:33AM +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:

> Which packages are actually using it? Should we drop pmi completely
> and convert the remaining packages to use hal or pm-utils directly?

I'd lean in that direction, but I've just uploaded a version that 
basically just triggers hal anyway. It's probably an unnecessary layer 
of abstraction, but to be honest I've got no idea what actually uses it 
now...

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59 at srcf.ucam.org