Proposed changes to workflow bug management

[Emilio Pozuelo Monfort]

Scott Kitterman wrote:
> I'd encourage anyone with ideas on how avoiding these bugs could be added to 
> the standard bug triage workflow in a reasonable way to discuss it on the 
> bugsquad mailing list.  Perhaps there's another way that'll be effective for 
> them that doesn't impact to extensively on the existing workflow.

I proposed before UDS to assign these workflow bugs to teams (e.g.
ubuntu-archive for confirmed syncs, ubuntu-{universe,main}-sponsors for
sponsorship requests, ubuntu-mir for MIR reports...

I was told bugsquad list of bugs exclude bugs with an assignee (and bugs with
status >= In Progress), so if that's true, this might be a good way. I
personally don't like the idea of making them private...

What does people (specially those in affected teams like ubuntu-archive) think
about this approach?

Emilio

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/attachments/20080527/130151d2/attachment.pgp