Best practice for reporting bugs

[Sarah Hobbs]

On 02/04/09 03:20, (``-_-´´) -- BUGabundo wrote:
> Olá Mackenzie e a todos.
>
> On Tuesday 31 March 2009 16:46:51 Mackenzie Morgan wrote:
>> On Monday 30 March 2009 6:48:44 pm (``-_-´´) -- BUGabundo wrote:
>>> Am I making such an hard question, or using the wrong example?
>> People and teams can have PPAs.  Neither have BTS.  Why are we discussing this
>> here?  This ought to be on launchpad-users, since it's LP that doesn't have
>> Malone for anything but distributions and projects.
>
> This is dragging much more then I wished it too.
> Let me give a couple of examples:
> Gwibber and Medibuntu packages.
>
> Pressing on Help->  Report a Problem on Gwibber (from a PPA) will lead me to https://bugs.launchpad.net/gwibber/+filebug
> Medibuntu bumps Archive Packages apps, and requests for bugs to be filed on their LP bug BTS (https://bugs.launchpad.net/medibuntu/+filebug)
>
> So if apport (remember this was where I started my interaction with this thread) is so smart about packages, why not report to the proper BTS instead of failing with has it does with some packages?

Because the proper BTS does not exist.  Wasn't this covered a few posts ago?

Hobbsee