"What I like least in Ubuntu"

[Iain Lane]

On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 08:54:00PM +0200, Michael Bienia wrote:
> On 2011-07-25 16:11:43 +0100, Iain Lane wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 05:01:35PM +0200, Daniel Holbach wrote:
> > > I agree that the name is misleading and it's unfortunate that it
> > > confuses applicants. It'd be good to change it something sensible. Even
> > > if we just change it in the documentation.
> > 
> > I just added a discussion item to the next DMB agenda to rename the team
> > to Ubuntu Development Members. This is in line with the other delegated
> > (non RMB) membership names, and I think is much less confusing.
> 
> I'm for a name change but only if it makes things more clear and easier
> to understand. But I disagree on "Ubuntu Development Members" as it's
> too easy to mix it up with "Ubuntu Developers". If applicants assume
> they get upload rights when they are members of "Ubuntu Development
> Members" nothing is gained.

I should have anticipated a bikeshed discussion on the name. I don't
care what it is (including dropping the team entirely). I only proposed
Ubuntu Development Members as it it fits in with the Ubuntu X Members
schema that you find elsewhere and having the team fits in with the
structure set up by the CC.

If people can come up with something that everybody likes then please
edit my agenda item so that we consider that name instead.

Cheers,

-- 
Iain Lane                                  [ iain at orangesquash.org.uk ]
Debian Developer                                   [ laney at debian.org ]
Ubuntu Developer                                   [ laney at ubuntu.com ]
PhD student                                       [ ial at cs.nott.ac.uk ]
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/attachments/20110727/e3c5f19a/attachment.pgp>